Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Rainy Day Fashion


Sometimes we forget that everyone is naked underneath their clothes. As I watched a long procession of potential buyers and A-list celebrities walk into the Burberry Fall/Winter Fashion show,  I tried to imagine (and not to imagine) certain people naked. Not flesh naked, but bare, so that I saw them only as people, as a single human being, regardless of what designer they were wearing. 

It was nearly impossible.

Why could I not get past the cloth draped over their frame; the curve of a heel on a “to-die-for” piece of footwear; the terrible aubergine jacket with orange trim?
How is it that some clothes make us drool, while others make us gag?
Why can clothes completely bend our opinion of someone, based on what they wear?

If someone says “a man,” no one would think of anyone special, but as soon as they say “a man in a Prada suit” we immediately have an image. He’s a fashionable, handsome man in a really nice suit; probably wealthy; probably important; definitely sexy. Cue drool. 

But what is this mystical power clothes hold over us? What strange magic they must possess to make us spend such a large portion of our minuscule disposable income on them. How do clothes do it?  
 
Maybe it’s because I was born in September, arguably the most important month of the year in fashion. But I doubt only September babies feel the undeniable power of fashion.

To answer these profound questions I turn first, as usual, to the people I respect most.
Pablo Neruda’s “Ode to Clothes” gave me some insight into our bizarre relationship with pieces of fabric.

Ode to Clothes
                             
Every morning you wait,
clothes, over a chair,
to fill yourself with
my vanity, my love,
my hope, my body.
Barely
risen from sleep,
I relinquish the water,
enter your sleeves,
my legs look for
the hollows of your legs,
and so embraced
by your indefatigable faithfulness
I rise, to tread the grass,
enter poetry,
consider through the windows,
the things,
the men, the women,
the deeds and the fights
go on forming me,
go on making me face things
working my hands,
opening my eyes,
using my mouth,
and so,
clothes,
I too go forming you,
extending your elbows,
snapping your threads,
and so your life expands
in the image of my life.
In the wind
you billow and snap
as if you were my soul,
at bad times
you cling
to my bones,
vacant, for the night,
darkness, sleep
populate with their phantoms
your wings and mine.
I wonder
if one day
a bullet
from the enemy
will leave you stained with my blood
and then
you will die with me
or one day
not quite
so dramatic
but simple,
you will fall ill,
clothes,
with me,
grow old
with me, with my body
and joined
we will enter
the earth.
Because of this
each day
I greet you
with reverence and then
you embrace me and I forget you,
because we are one
and we will go on
facing the wind, in the night,
the streets or the fight,
a single body,
one day, one day, some day, still.
~Pablo Neruda 

Clothes become one with us. We become synonymous with our clothes. Who can think “Givenchy black dress” without thinking “Audrey Hepburn”? Or “safety pins and the Queen of England” without thinking “Vivienne Westwood”? Or “charcoal trousers” without thinking “Professor Steven Driscoll Hixson”? In a ceremony of matrimony, we unite ourselves with our clothes every morning. Getting dressed in the dark often leads to a bad marriage, and even divorce. And when our brief affairs turn “last season”, we take our ex-lovers to Goodwill, hoping someone else might elope with them at a seriously discounted price. But what are the rules of engagement? What are the rules of fashion? With a question so stupendous and absurd, I turn to an equally stupendous and absurd figure to answer it.

“The only rule is don't be boring and dress cute wherever you go. Life is too short to blend in.”
~Paris Hilton
The ever-wise Paris Hilton has made an interesting point. Fashion is a form of self-expression. In rare cases, we can see someone both naked and clothed, if their clothes are a true expression of their inner-selves. Or, we can see them both naked and clothed if their clothes are extremely sheer. But in its purest form:

“Fashion is only the attempt to realize art in living forms and social intercourse.”
Francis Bacon
But fashion is a great paradox. It is accessible only to the elite, but eventually the masses. In a strange “circle of life” way fashion unites us all in an interwoven textile web of existence. A favorite quote from “The Devil Wears Prada” best exemplifies this sentiment:


“This… ‘stuff’? Oh… ok. I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select out, oh I don’t know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you’re trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don’t know is that that sweater is not just blue, it’s not turquoise, it’s not lapis, it’s actually cerulean. You’re also blindly unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves St Laurent, wasn’t it, who showed cerulean military jackets? And then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of 8 different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic casual corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs and so it’s sort of comical how you think that you’ve made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when, in fact, you’re wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room. From a pile of stuff.”


But fashion is not restricted to clothing. It is not always found in department stores, corner boutiques, haberdasheries, and runways.
Fashion is not something that exists in dresses only. Fashion is in the sky, in the street, fashion has to do with ideas, the way we live, what is happening.
~Coco Chanel

 
But like seasons, fashions come and go. Ideas flow, and in the blink of an eye what as cute yesterday is hideous today.

Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.
~Oscar Wilde
I’d much rather be called stylish than fashionable.









 
Fashions fade, style is eternal.
~Yves Saint Laurent 

If anything, fashion is fickle. It’s flighty and fake and so often shallow.
Open any fashion magazine and you’ll see underweight models who’ve been airbrushed past recognition, so unreal and unattainable they make you feel just guilty enough to eat a bland salad instead of the deliciously greasy sandwich you really craved.
Stand outside in the freezing cold to take pictures of people you’ve never seen before walk into a fashion show and you’ll realize that underneath their Gucci handbags, Jimmy Choo’s, Versace skirts and Prada suits, they’re naked just like the rest of us: their self expression just has a bigger price tag on it.




Above all, remember that the most important thing you can take anywhere is not a Gucci bag or French-cut jeans; it's an open mind
~Gail Rubin Bereny


http://judithpordon.tripod.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/layout/spacer.gif

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

a rainy day food inquiry

 
Food is historical and spiritual. To eat is to engage in a ritual, a scared practice shared by all living creatures on earth. Everything we know today, every action of our lives, can be defined by culture. The root of this word, and the reason humans could develop “culture,” comes from agriculture, “agra” field and “cultura” to cultivate: quite literally “to cultivate soil”. Man had finally understood how to “control” nature, and the human ego inflated once again, creating a relationship with food which was both perverse and beautiful. 
 

The downfall of the perfect world was food. As Eve broke the skin of the forbidden fruit, she also broke our intimate bond with the creator. Perhaps our dichotomous thinking about food stems from this instance. And since, food has remained dichotomous, encompassing both good and evil, life and death. For me, consuming food is as much a historical and spiritual experience as it is an ethical decision. While most people’s decisions about what they eat surround three basic categories, such as “is this what I’m in the mood for?” or “will this make me fat” or “is this worth the price I’m about to pay,” my questions about food become seemingly infinite. Eating an orange is not just eating an orange for me.


Why kind of an orange is this? Is it a Valencia orange? Was it grown from an already existing species of orange or was it grown from a genetically modified seed? Is this strain of orange devastating naturally occurring strains of oranges, overtaking them until the genetic variety is so scarce there only exist in small pockets of the world 7 truly different types of oranges? Who owns the genetically modified orange? Do I support the ownership of genetic material, the building blocks of life? Are there any alternatives?
Is there a chemical wax coating to preserve its freshness? Do I need to wash this chemical off? Was that chemical tested on animals before it was approved safe for human consumption? What will that chemical do to my earth once it is placed in a garbage heap?


Where was my orange grown? Whose land was this orange grown on? Did it once belong to native populations, but when a large food company viewed it as potentially prosperous, did they pay the government to slowly force the people off the land their families had owned for generations? Do they crop dust, causing the locals to have serious health problems, and babies to have serious birth defects?  Does the water they used to nourish the growing oranges come from an already depleted reservoir, or a renewable source?


Who picks the orange? Are they paid fair wages? Do they receive good health benefits? Do they live in decent housing? Are they old enough to be considered an eligible worker, or did a child pick this orange?

How did this orange get to this store? Was it transported by a carrier which also pays its workers fair wages? Does it use environmentally conscious methods of transportation?

How was this orange packaged? With plastics that cause so much pollution in their production? With wood, which contributes to deforestation? Who designed the graphics for this company? Did they ever think about what actually goes into the making of this orange, all of the lives, both human and animal, it affects or destroys?

What does this store, which I am purchasing the orange from, support? Are they making black market deals with ConAgra for their produce, simultaneously supporting the murdering of peasants in Paraguay and Uruguay?
What will eating this orange do to my body? Will it taste good and bring me pleasure? Is it healthy for me? Will it provide my body with the nutrients it needs, while not polluting it with so many toxins it overrides any benefit it could provide? And lastly, how much does this orange cost? Do I have enough money to purchase this orange?

On a spiritual and physical level, you are what you eat. Do I want this orange to become a part of my body, the house of my soul? Can I eat this orange and feel good about it, ethically, spiritually, sensually? By eating this orange am I supporting suffering? Am I supporting death by giving myself life? I’m going to give myself an ulcer just thinking about food. This is my ethical experience with food: neurotic, paranoid, philosophical, and usually not enjoyable.

For me, all food is food for thought. 

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Another bloody rainy day at 37 Hyde Park Gate

The bloody alarm didn’t go off
You woke up with a bloody cough
You really need to bloody pee
It’s bloody dark and you can’t see
You and the bloody door collide
The bloody bathroom’s occupied
You bloody wait and bloody wait
Every day in Hyde Park Gate

The bloody kitchen’s bloody packed
The dirty dishes are bloody stacked
You bloody wish to go back home
Someone bloody ate your Toblerone
Your bloody milk is bloody sour
You bloody realize the bloody hour
You’re bloody going to be bloody late
Running out of Hyde Park Gate

You’re bloody hungry all the bloody time
And all you’ve got is a bloody lime
The bloody food is bloody bad
Grocery shopping makes you bloody mad
It’s bloody expensive as bloody hell
But all you can say is oh bloody well
And that’s your bloody general state
Every day at Hyde Park Gate

The bloody flat is bloody old
The bloody air is bloody cold
The bloody beds bloody creak
The bloody doors bloody squeak
The bloody Internet doesn’t bloody work
The bloody workmen bloody lurk
Everything’s just so bloody great
At 37 Hyde Park Gate

Don’t be fooled by the bloody address
This bloody apartment is a bloody mess
The bloody toilet is bloody clogged
The bloody ceiling is water-logged
The bloody carpet harasses your eyes
(And it bloody smells, no bloody surprise)
In this bloody shameful real estate
That’s 37 Hyde Park Gate

The bloody room that’s twenty by twelve
Doesn’t bloody have a single bloody shelve
It’s bloody tiny as can bloody be
It’s bloody way too small for three
The bloody lights are out by 10
You bloody trip, and trip again
You bloody question your bloody fate
Every night in Hyde Park Gate

You bloody do dishes in the bloody sink
That bloody aren’t yours, and you bloody think
This bloody isn’t bloody fair
And the bloody Dutch just bloody stare
And there’s no bloody laundry machine
Any bloody where to be bloody seen
And Goldie-locks is your bloody roommate
Every day at Hyde Park Gate

You bloody walk out into bloody rain
You bloody miss the bloody train
You bloody want some bloody peace
But the bloody sitting duck won’t cease
To bloody talk all the bloody time
You’re bloody about to lose your mind
In this bloody place you love and hate
Called 37 Hyde Park Gate

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

A rainy day in Never Never Land



“Mummy, look at the Indian.” As I sat on the bus, compulsively checking the street signs at every intersection to be sure I didn’t miss my stop, I overheard this darling little boy speak to his mother. He was pointing to a book on his lap, his mother gazing out the window. What really sparked my interest, though, was the fluffy brown teddy bear tucked securely under his left arm. Immediately I saw this little English boy as Michael, the youngest of the Darling children from J.M. Barrie’s “Peter Pan and Wendy.” Was this boy looked after by a Saint Bernard named Nana? Did his older sister leave her window open every night, perchance so a young boy might listen to her stories? And suddenly the bus is not a bus, and the road names are not “St. James” or “Gardiner.” A thick fog creeps in from all corners, filled with effervescent capsules of memories, floating around me waiting to reveal their reminiscences. Julie London’s voice announces over the PA system: “Gonna take a sentimental journey.” What street was I looking for? A gleaming bubble encapsulates my head.

Youth is wasted on the young. In every octogenarian lives an eight year old boy or girl, pleading with the world to release them from their decrepit body, still waiting for that mystical boy to shake fairy dust on them and fly away, powered only by pure happy thoughts. Where is Tinker Bell, that mischievous and jealous fairy, with her bodacious hips and ballerina bun? What makes the story of Peter Pan so sad and so beloved worldwide? It’s everyone’s story, in a sense. It’s a story of coming to terms with lost innocence, the story of that one cruel realization that our bodies force our minds to grow up. The soft lines of childhood are perverted as fat accumulates, jutting out in places it never did before, and the soft silken hair of bonnie heads coarsens and spreads like an infectious disease. It’s curious to think that most people spend their entire childhood wishing to be older, only to spend the rest of their adulthood wishing to be younger. But to live as a child forever? Thus far, none save a solitary boy have achieved the great feat.

I examine the teddy bear a second time. Another bubble circles my head with a whirling haze. The mist clears and I am staring at a familiar face, brown and fuzzy, with a black threaded nose and two glass-bead eyes. My sheets are covered with Belle and the Beast: using my sophisticated system of sheet-dating it’s 1992 and I am 3 years old. As I trace the bear’s scarlet velvet heart, I can feel my pervasive nervousness. My mom is at the hospital, waiting for the baby to come out of her tummy. My sister, the eternal babysitter by proxy, suggests we watch a movie. I drag Teddy down the oatmeal carpeted stairs to the family room as my sister feeds Walt Disney’s Peter Pan into the mouth of the black machine. For weeks after, the sound of soft little feet padding to the window would be followed by the muffled grinding of wood against wood. A cold breeze would find its way through the half-open window, and a little girl, with a teddy bear secured tightly under her arm, would dream of the boy who would come and take her on marvelous adventures.  

This bubble is soon replaced by another. My sheets are blue with crisscrossing lines, seemingly mapping the infinite crossroads and decisions to come. It’s 2003, and I am 13 years old. I am in immense physical and emotional pain. Through a hideous operation I’ve been left mutilated. My face is puffy and my cheeks and gums are bleeding. Braces are an excellent metaphor for growing up. Imposed by the restrictions and beliefs of adults, they are cemented on without consent, to force your teeth to conform, obey, and become what society expects. They are constantly checked, tightened, and reordered. They are the source of much physical and emotional turmoil. Metal, as unmalleable as time, glints as it catches the light, reflecting an awkward and disproportionate smile as the photographer snaps a school photo. This is when I learned to not smile with my teeth. This is when I began to grow up. This is the year I stopped my midnight visits to the window.

And yet, Peter Pan lives on. Our subconscious remains his Neverland. He is always present, always at the window we secretly keep open in our hearts, waiting for childhood to find us again. He leaves us little reminders. I see his smile in the little boy with his teddy bear on the bus, dreaming of Indians. Like the silver thimble Wendy gifted to Peter Pan, I too keep a symbol of my childhood near to me. If you arrive at the window of 37 Hyde Park Gate, Room 2G and peek in, on the top bunk in the corner, the bedraggled but friendly face of an old teddy bear will peek back at you from under the covers.  

Saturday, January 22, 2011

A rainy day introduction


If you ask my mother, she’ll tell you I was born in the state of misery. I was, of course, born in the State of Missouri, but this verbal play summarizes my beginning and subsequent life events. The day before I was born, a plague of locusts descended upon our little house in Springfield, nearly scarring my mother into labor. At the hospital, my mother was forced to have an epidural, and my father was forced to clean her bedpan. As my mother went into labor, an audience of medical students joined the doctor to witness my prophetic delivery, much to her dismay. As my parents approached the nursery window to collect me and take me home after I was cleaned, they overheard the crowd whispering to one another like clandestine lovers “what’s wrong with that one, why is it so red?” “It looks like a demon child.” These hushed comments were directed towards the baby in the back, with a full head of dark curly hair and the skin of a sleeping Wisconsinite on the beaches of Cancun, badger red from thousands of scratches. The name on the front of the plastic bin read “Lauryn,” spelled with a y.
When the girl next door traversed the yard to inspect the new arrival and entered our house barefoot my mother asked “where are your shoes?” To this she replied “I ain’t got no shoes.” It was then my mother demanded we move. Two weeks later we were in Colorado, and thus marked the beginning of my colic. After several months I finally stopped crying and started to become mobile and vocal. It is said that the best liars believe their own lies, and I was my own most fervent disciple. My active imagination and subsequent mastery of speech allowed me to tell stories, which my mother classified as lies and dealt with accordingly. The only praise I received for my epic tales was a good grind of Irish Spring against my molars and by the time I was 7 I had probably consumed at least 5 bars of soap. Day-dreamy and prone to indulging in my reveries, at a young age I became a romantic. So mesmerized by my own inward thoughts, I became a Don Quixote-esque fool in my quests for adventure. The shriveled and blackened key I once placed in a light socket, believing it to be a portal which would open up behind a secret waterfall, still lies in a drawer in the front hall table. If it weren’t for the circuit-breaker, I’d probably be dead. But no amount of Irish spring, spankings, or time outs could extinguish my creativity, and instead forced me to recline deeper into my hallucinations. At school other children viewed me as spacey and odd, and the constant moving from place to place (6 times in the first 5 years of my life) made it difficult for me to form friendships. Plagued by a persistent social and physical awkwardness, things did not improve during my teens. My only consolation was the discovery of the blues. Albert King and I have much in common. Although his soulful black voice and rapturous guitar riffs are far beyond me, I too was born under a bad sign. Albert saw the upside to our misfortune, crooning “If it wasn’t for bad luck, I wouldn’t have no luck at all.” After him, I discovered a plethora of blues musicians, because if anything, misery loves company, and misery was my state of birth. My predilection to live in my head and an acquired “theory of mind” first sparked my interest in what was to become my major and inspire my life’s ambitions. What would it be like to live in someone else’s mind, to understand their world so completely, and become so immersed in it that the lines of whose world is whose blend more perfectly than my fantasies superimposed over my reality. If you hadn’t guessed, I’m a psychology major.
Like the magic portal which has yet to unlock itself in the light socket, books served as portals into other worlds for me, and I ventured through many, most especially the classics. I had often felt like a historical anachronism, misplaced in time. Why was I not alive in the time of Jane Austen, or of F Scott Fitzgerald; and if I was born just 20 years earlier I could have heard one of my favorite poets, John Cooper Clarke, recite before a Clash concert. Perhaps it was yet another consequence of being born under a bad sign. Through my paper journeys I discovered the most marvelous novel, whose title could also title my life: La Vida Es Sueno by Calderon. No English translation of this Spanish book could fully interpret the profound questions and philosophies it professed, and so I decided to learn Spanish, my second major. From this philosophy came others, and eventually I stumbled upon a missing piece of my soul, and my true purpose in life: animals. To say I harbored a deep love of animals would never do justice to the incessant war of begging and imploring I waged against my parents for a dog. I was apparently quite persuasive because we currently have adopted two dogs into our family, the two eternal loves of my life, Oliver and Murphy. My dim understanding and great awe of our fellow earthlings has led me to a simple conclusion: I love them, so I don’t eat them. From this an entire way of life enfolded, and it is my current belief that no one should eat creatures which have thoughts of their own. This realization has propelled me into animal activism, the most depressing and dismal struggle, a sure losing battle against the up-most unethical delicacy so ingrained on the palate of human culture that it will take generations to make right. It would be easier to just not care, but that is impossible for me. It’s things like this which make me wonder: a spiritual calling to higher ethics, or born under a bad sign?
My luck seemed to have reversed and inverted itself when I first met Jacob, the mysterious boy with tattoos and tight pants who told me I looked like Juliette Lewis and licked paint off my leg in art class. It was love at first lick. To have found my soul mate so early in life atones for all my previous tribulations. Withholding the tales that lie between these two events, I find myself in London, still walking down the road less traveled by, wondering what other journeys I might discover (or invent). Perhaps the time of my bad sign is over, or perhaps it never really was a bad sign to begin with.   

A rainy day at the Musem of Natural History

 There he is. Again. Oh god, is he actually coming over here this time? I can hear the soft clack of his shoes as he walks over. He's leaning over my shoulder, he thinks I don’t notice. Didn’t your mother ever tell you all women have eyes in the backs of their heads? I can feel him watching me, watching my hand. I can hardly stand the scrutiny: the judgment has been passed, but the gavel slammed down without a sound. I feel a lush flush of red, tinting my cheeks and flooding my ears with heat. Please leave, please become distracted. I can feel his eyes tracing over the twisted and bent lines on the page. As a result, the drawing is worse. I've drawn too darkly and thrown off my shadows. It looks like a five year old drew it. Rethinking this statement, it could even be taken as an insult to 5 year olds, some of whom are quite talented. I apologize. Like a violent rape, I've left this once beautiful and pure white page defiled, bleeding black ink, with black scratches and bruises to match. Not to mention the injustice I've done to the museum, with its vaulting arches, its painted glass windows, its grand marble staircase. I should just leave. I feel like the infidel, the non-artistic intruder daring to sketch this hallowed hall. I hear someone speaking French quite loudly. It sounds like outrage. "How dare she?” “How horrible for such a beautiful museum to be translated so poorly onto the page.” I slouch over my sketch book, hunching to hide my hideous scribbles. I stop to take another long look, trying so hard to analyze the shapes, the negative space, the angles, the shadows, all while using my hand to cover the majority of my blasphemous copy. If Holden Caulfield were here, he’d peg me as a phony in seconds, a damn phony. Impostor! I feel more eyes on me. Impostor, Impostor! They yell at me. Under this pressure I draw a very crooked line. Damn! It looks even worse, although I’d hardly have thought it possible a minute ago. Time to relocate. 

I’ll hide among my brethren, my long lost cousins. But even in the mammal exhibit I feel watched. Hundreds of black beady eyes stare at me, some ferociously, some fearfully. I’m not here to hurt you! I just want to draw, undisturbed. I find an unsuspecting spot to stand in, hoping I’ll go unnoticed. I begin to draw again. But I can’t stop catching the gaze of the bear, the glare of the tiger, the blank stare of the otter. Odd, to think that in life none of these creatures would have ever come into contact with one another. Now they’re inmates, trapped forever in a prison of glass and plastic. And now instead of fear they begin invoke pity, and then sympathy. But who is really staring at whom? Are we judging them, or are we the ones on trial? Are we the exhibit, and they the spectators? Perhaps. Their eyes silently watch, seemingly blank and dumb, but in the black depths there is a hint of understanding. Is this how the antelope feel as they are appraised by the lion, hidden in the grass (or in this case hidden behind glass). What would this proud lion think of me? Would he see me as his enemy, a member of the species that shot him, skinned him, stuffed him, and now stares crassly at him, analyzing him as if he were just another specimen? Probably. And I wouldn’t blame him. Or the otter. Or the polar bear. Especially the polar bear. In 30 years, all polar bears left on earth will look just like her; frozen, motionless, statuesque, sentenced to remain in a single pose for the rest of her artificially sustained existence. What do they think of my drawing, I wonder. Probably what the peeping-tom and the French couple thought. Horrendous. Repulsive. Shameful even. Please let me apologize, I meant no harm. I never intended for my sketch to be offensive to your glass eyes. I’d also like to apologize on behalf of the human race. We’re too proud and selfish to leave you alone. We’re too curious and self-righteous to not stuff and study you. I’m sorry we killed you, and thousands of your kind. I know it’s wrong, but I represent the minority. Yes, it is we who are the dumb ones. You’re quite right, we are the creatures without souls. And now I face a scrutiny of a different kind. I am no longer on trial for aesthetics, for artistic merit and worth. I am now on trial as a being, a fellow earthling. This is a judgment of another kind, a kind I can’t bear. And the bear still stares. Like Cinderella at the ball, I’m suddenly thrust out of my day dream as the clock strikes. 5:00, time to go home. But instead of a glass slipper, all I have to remember this time is a poorly sketched picture. Oh well.